<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outsiderism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinesebroccoli.org/2006/05/25/outsiderism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinesebroccoli.org/2006/05/25/outsiderism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://chinesebroccoli.org/2006/05/25/outsiderism/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesebroccoli.org/?p=20#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Yah i&#039;m with Jeremy on the irony of that conversation. But that&#039;s all of what I find exhausting about dealing with idealogues on the left (and slipping over into counter culture). They are rule-bound, and not in a way that uses rules to achieve forward motion but rather just uses them to right some wrong.

I&#039;ve heard stories of ActUP meetings grinding to a halt because their rigid &#039;F/M/ftm/mtf/q...&quot; question asking structure didn&#039;t merely allow for all to be heard but REQUIRED that they did, and if nobody from the whatever category had anything to say they&#039;d wait. Now the story may be apocryphal, but in any case it is illustrative of how the far left (and yes I mean the NDP as well) can be more interestd in process and procedure than acheivemnt. But I&#039;m a white male, so what do I know.

How did you not just tell them to fuck off and buy your book? Wouldn&#039;t that just have been the MOST anarchic thing to do?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah i&#8217;m with Jeremy on the irony of that conversation. But that&#8217;s all of what I find exhausting about dealing with idealogues on the left (and slipping over into counter culture). They are rule-bound, and not in a way that uses rules to achieve forward motion but rather just uses them to right some wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard stories of ActUP meetings grinding to a halt because their rigid &#8216;F/M/ftm/mtf/q&#8230;&#8221; question asking structure didn&#8217;t merely allow for all to be heard but REQUIRED that they did, and if nobody from the whatever category had anything to say they&#8217;d wait. Now the story may be apocryphal, but in any case it is illustrative of how the far left (and yes I mean the NDP as well) can be more interestd in process and procedure than acheivemnt. But I&#8217;m a white male, so what do I know.</p>
<p>How did you not just tell them to fuck off and buy your book? Wouldn&#8217;t that just have been the MOST anarchic thing to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wilson</title>
		<link>http://chinesebroccoli.org/2006/05/25/outsiderism/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 17:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesebroccoli.org/?p=20#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming you chose to simply ignore the irony of Anarchists imposing even stricter rules on things than anyone else?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming you chose to simply ignore the irony of Anarchists imposing even stricter rules on things than anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
